On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:34:20 +0530
Ashish Jangam wrote:
> (This rtc patch is resend for merge)
> ---
> This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
> the DA9055 MFD core.
>
> This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
>
> ...
>
> +static int __init
(This rtc patch is resend for merge)
---
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
the DA9055 MFD core.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
---
changes since version v3:
- use of
(This rtc patch is resend for merge)
---
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
the DA9055 MFD core.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen dc...@diasemi.com
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:34:20 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
(This rtc patch is resend for merge)
---
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
the DA9055 MFD core.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
...
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 13:11 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:12:29 +0530
> Ashish Jangam wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:54 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
> > > >
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:12:29 +0530
Ashish Jangam wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:54 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
> > > Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:12:29 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:54 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 13:11 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:12:29 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:54 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:54 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
> > Ashish Jangam wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > > Does this patch looks good?
> > > > On Thu,
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:54 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Does this patch looks good?
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
> Ashish Jangam wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > Does this patch looks good?
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > > This is the
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
> Ashish Jangam wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > Does this patch looks good?
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > > This is the
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Does this patch looks good?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Does this patch looks good?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
Ashish Jangam wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > Does this patch looks good?
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency
> > > on
>
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:03 +0530
Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Does this patch looks good?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got
..@linux-foundation.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sa...@linux.intel.com;
> > p_gortma...@yahoo.com; dc...@diasemi.com; rtc-
> > li...@googlegroups.com; Alessandro Zummo
> > Subject: Re: [Patch v3 3/7] rtc: DA9055 RTC driver
> >
> > Any comments on this
el.com;
> p_gortma...@yahoo.com; dc...@diasemi.com; rtc-
> li...@googlegroups.com; Alessandro Zummo
> Subject: Re: [Patch v3 3/7] rtc: DA9055 RTC driver
>
> Any comments on this patch.
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > Does this patch looks good?
>
Any comments on this patch.
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> Does this patch looks good?
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
> > the DA9055 MFD core.
> >
> > This patch
Any comments on this patch.
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Does this patch looks good?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
the DA9055 MFD core.
This patch is
; dc...@diasemi.com; rtc-
li...@googlegroups.com; Alessandro Zummo
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 3/7] rtc: DA9055 RTC driver
Any comments on this patch.
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Does this patch looks good?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote
@vger.kernel.org; sa...@linux.intel.com;
p_gortma...@yahoo.com; dc...@diasemi.com; rtc-
li...@googlegroups.com; Alessandro Zummo
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 3/7] rtc: DA9055 RTC driver
Any comments on this patch.
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Does this patch looks
Does this patch looks good?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
> the DA9055 MFD core.
>
> This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
>
Does this patch looks good?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 16:10 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
the DA9055 MFD core.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen dc...@diasemi.com
On Thursday 11 October 2012 04:10 PM, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> +#define da9055_rtc_freeze NULL
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops da9055_rtc_pm_ops = {
> + .suspend = da9055_rtc_suspend,
> + .resume = da9055_rtc_resume,
> +
> + .freeze = da9055_rtc_freeze,
> + .thaw =
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
the DA9055 MFD core.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
---
changes since version v3:
- use of module_platform_driver macro
- add the
This is the RTC patch for the DA9055 PMIC. This patch has got dependency on
the DA9055 MFD core.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen dc...@diasemi.com
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam ashish.jan...@kpitcummins.com
---
changes since version v3:
-
On Thursday 11 October 2012 04:10 PM, Ashish Jangam wrote:
+#define da9055_rtc_freeze NULL
+#endif
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops da9055_rtc_pm_ops = {
+ .suspend = da9055_rtc_suspend,
+ .resume = da9055_rtc_resume,
+
+ .freeze = da9055_rtc_freeze,
+ .thaw =
28 matches
Mail list logo