On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:02:53PM -0700, Andy King wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > in the next few days with that change along with any modifications
> > necessary after a sparse sanity check.
>
> We have a change that fixes things, but I wanted to check if you
> had any additional comments before we se
Hi Greg,
> in the next few days with that change along with any modifications
> necessary after a sparse sanity check.
We have a change that fixes things, but I wanted to check if you
had any additional comments before we send out more patches. In
all likelihood you'd probably already given up i
> For many many years, you shipped closed source Linux kernel drivers
> for
> your products. Only recently has this changed.
and
> > all our Linux drivers, even if not all are upstream [yet], are GPL.
>
> That's nice to hear, although without proof of that, we have to take
> your word :)
The f
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 02:03:20 PM Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:43:50PM -0700, Bhavesh Davda wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > > You can't just say "general GPL issues aside". Honestly, given your
> > > company's prior actions in regards to Linux kernel drivers and the
> > > licen
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 02:04:48 PM Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:45:39PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 25, 2012 01:31:48 PM Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andy King wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > > > +EXPORT_SYM
Hi Greg,
> You can't just say "general GPL issues aside". Honestly, given your
> company's prior actions in regards to Linux kernel drivers and the
> licenses of them, I don't trust them at all. To help gain that trust
> back, marking the exports in this manner will be a great improvement.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:45:39PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thursday, October 25, 2012 01:31:48 PM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andy King wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmci_device_get);
> > > >
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for this,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:43:50PM -0700, Bhavesh Davda wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > You can't just say "general GPL issues aside". Honestly, given your
> > company's prior actions in regards to Linux kernel drivers and the
> > licenses of them, I don't trust them at all. To help gain that trust
> >
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 01:31:48 PM Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andy King wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmci_device_get);
> > >
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for this, and all other exports?
> >
> > We'd prefer to leave them as vanilla exports.
Hi Greg,
> You can't just say "general GPL issues aside". Honestly, given your
> company's prior actions in regards to Linux kernel drivers and the
> licenses of them, I don't trust them at all. To help gain that trust
> back, marking the exports in this manner will be a great improvement.
>
Yo
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andy King wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmci_device_get);
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for this, and all other exports?
>
> We'd prefer to leave them as vanilla exports. While we're committed
> to open-sourcing everything, including our non-up
Hi Greg,
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmci_device_get);
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for this, and all other exports?
We'd prefer to leave them as vanilla exports. While we're committed
to open-sourcing everything, including our non-upstreamed drivers,
we don't really have a strong opinion regarding consuming
12 matches
Mail list logo