Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?

2007-10-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 5 October 2007 18:27, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP? > > > > Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power . > >

Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?

2007-10-05 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP? > > Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power . Ok, perhaps, a "select" would be better?... Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liak

Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?

2007-10-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP? Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power . > So without sleep support you cannot use "Make CPU Idle calls when idle ", > "Use real mode APM BIOS call to power off" etc? Found

[Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?

2007-10-05 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP? So without sleep support you cannot use "Make CPU Idle calls when idle ", "Use real mode APM BIOS call to power off" etc? Found in 23-rc9-git of yesterday. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux