Hi.
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 17:50, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:11:17 +1000
>
> > In making some modifications to Suspend, we've discovered that some
> > arches use kmalloc and others use get_free_pages to allocate the stack.
> > Is
From: Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:11:17 +1000
> In making some modifications to Suspend, we've discovered that some
> arches use kmalloc and others use get_free_pages to allocate the stack.
> Is there a reason for the variation? If not, could the following patch
Hi all.
In making some modifications to Suspend, we've discovered that some
arches use kmalloc and others use get_free_pages to allocate the stack.
Is there a reason for the variation? If not, could the following patch
be considered for inclusion (tested on x86 only).
Regards,
Nigel
arch/frv/k
3 matches
Mail list logo