On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:09:07AM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:05:24 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > If you don't want to encode that knowledge in libvirt or other
> > > > management software for s390, it looks like you need something like a
> > > >
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:05:24 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >
> > > If you don't want to encode that knowledge in libvirt or other
> > > management software for s390, it looks like you need something like a
> > > "stable-abi-safe" field on CpuDefinitionInfo?
> >
> > Exactly that fulfills
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:05:24 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
If you don't want to encode that knowledge in libvirt or other
management software for s390, it looks like you need something like a
stable-abi-safe field on CpuDefinitionInfo?
Exactly that fulfills
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:09:07AM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:05:24 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
If you don't want to encode that knowledge in libvirt or other
management software for s390, it looks like you need something like a
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:05:31PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:59:05 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > > Not directly invalid as "-cpu none" will be the same as omitting the -cpu
> > > option.
> > > KVM will setup the vcpu properties withou any QEMU control to
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:05:31 +0200
Michael Mueller wrote:
> And cpu model "none" just means that QEMU does not manage the cpu model.
> That's also
> the reason why I initially returned an empty "[]" model and not "none". This
> somewhat
> convinces me to go back to this approach...
And for
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:59:05 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Not directly invalid as "-cpu none" will be the same as omitting the -cpu
> > option.
> > KVM will setup the vcpu properties withou any QEMU control to whatever the
> > hosting
> > machine and the kvm kernel code offers. That will
(CCing libvir-list and Jiri Denemark for libvirt-related discussion
about -cpu host/none, and live-migration safety expectations)
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:01:13 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:01:13 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:09:09PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:35:26 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > > > This patch implements
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:01:13 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:09:09PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:35:26 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
(CCing libvir-list and Jiri Denemark for libvirt-related discussion
about -cpu host/none, and live-migration safety expectations)
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:01:13 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31,
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:59:05 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
Not directly invalid as -cpu none will be the same as omitting the -cpu
option.
KVM will setup the vcpu properties withou any QEMU control to whatever the
hosting
machine and the kvm kernel code offers. That
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:05:31 +0200
Michael Mueller m...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
And cpu model none just means that QEMU does not manage the cpu model.
That's also
the reason why I initially returned an empty [] model and not none. This
somewhat
convinces me to go back to this approach...
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:05:31PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:59:05 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
Not directly invalid as -cpu none will be the same as omitting the -cpu
option.
KVM will setup the vcpu properties withou any QEMU control to
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:21:05PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:17:21 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > > This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
> > > It returns the cpu
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:20:43PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/30/2015 02:17 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> >> This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
> >> It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:17:21 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
> > It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
> >
> > request:
> > {"execute"
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:50:20 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Hello Eduardo,
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.c b/target-s390x/cpu.c
> > index 829945d..1698b52 100644
> > --- a/target-s390x/cpu.c
> > +++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:19:27 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/30/2015 08:28 AM, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
> > It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
> >
> >
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:50:20 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello Eduardo,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.c b/target-s390x/cpu.c
index 829945d..1698b52 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu.c
+++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:19:27 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:28 AM, Michael Mueller wrote:
This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:17:21 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
request:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:21:05PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:17:21 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
It returns
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:20:43PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/30/2015 02:17 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing
On 03/30/2015 02:17 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
>> This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
>> It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
>>
>> request:
>> {"execute" : "query-cpu-model"
On 03/30/2015 08:28 AM, Michael Mueller wrote:
> This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
> It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
>
> request:
> {"execute" : "query-cpu-model" }
>
> answer:
> {"return" : {"name": "2827-ga2", "accel": "kvm" }}
On 03/30/2015 02:17 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
request:
{execute : query-cpu-model }
answer:
On 03/30/2015 08:28 AM, Michael Mueller wrote:
This patch implements a new QMP request named 'query-cpu-model'.
It returns the cpu model of cpu 0 and its backing accelerator.
request:
{execute : query-cpu-model }
answer:
{return : {name: 2827-ga2, accel: kvm }}
Alias names are
28 matches
Mail list logo
