On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:19:13 +0200
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > >> Would it make sense to do the cast here
> > > >
> > > > cpu_model_get/set() is used to handle both attributes,
> > > > KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE and KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR.
> > > > Both require a different type in the signat
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:07:58 +0200
Michael Mueller wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:52:54 +0200
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> > Am 27.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Michael Mueller:
> > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:15:47 +0200
> > > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am 13.04.2015 um 15:56 s
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:52:54 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 27.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Michael Mueller:
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:15:47 +0200
> > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >> Am 13.04.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Michael Mueller:
> >> [...]
> >>> +static int cpu_model_get(KVMState
Am 27.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Michael Mueller:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:15:47 +0200
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> Am 13.04.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Michael Mueller:
>> [...]
>>> +static int cpu_model_get(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr)
>>> +{
>>> +int rc = -ENOSYS;
>>> +str
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:15:47 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 13.04.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Michael Mueller:
> [...]
> > +static int cpu_model_get(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr)
> > +{
> > +int rc = -ENOSYS;
> > +struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = {
> > +.group = K
Am 13.04.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Michael Mueller:
[...]
> +static int cpu_model_get(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr)
> +{
> +int rc = -ENOSYS;
> +struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = {
> +.group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL,
> +.attr = attr,
> +.addr = addr,
Would i
6 matches
Mail list logo