Con Kolivas wrote:
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 05:29, Bill Davidsen wrote:
System: Intel 6600 Core2duo, 2GB RAM, X nice 0 for all tests, display
using i945G framebuffer
Bill thanks for testing.
Test: playing a 'toon with mplayer while kernel build -j20 running.
Umm I don't think
Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:58:45PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Followup: I reran with sd-0.46, setting rr_interval to 40, and then 5
(default was 16). Neither appeared to give a useful video playback. I
did try setting the make to nice 10, and that made the playback
p
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 05:29, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> System: Intel 6600 Core2duo, 2GB RAM, X nice 0 for all tests, display
> using i945G framebuffer
Bill thanks for testing.
>
> Test: playing a 'toon with mplayer while kernel build -j20 running.
Umm I don't think make -j20 is a realistic load on
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:58:45PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Followup: I reran with sd-0.46, setting rr_interval to 40, and then 5
> (default was 16). Neither appeared to give a useful video playback. I
> did try setting the make to nice 10, and that made the playback
> perfectly smooth, as
Bill Davidsen wrote:
System: Intel 6600 Core2duo, 2GB RAM, X nice 0 for all tests, display
using i945G framebuffer
Test: playing a 'toon with mplayer while kernel build -j20 running.
Tuning: not yet, all scheduler parameters were default
Result: base 2.6.21 showed some pauses and after the pa
System: Intel 6600 Core2duo, 2GB RAM, X nice 0 for all tests, display
using i945G framebuffer
Test: playing a 'toon with mplayer while kernel build -j20 running.
Tuning: not yet, all scheduler parameters were default
Result: base 2.6.21 showed some pauses and after the pause the sound got
lou
6 matches
Mail list logo
