On 26/01/2018 at 13:06:01 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula
> 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula
> get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem()
> function to avoid th
Hi Alexandre,
On 26 January 2018 at 17:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula
>> 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula
>> get one incorrect re
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula
> 'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula
> get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem()
> function to avoid t
If we convert one large time values to rtc_time, in the original formula
'days * 86400' can be overflowed in 'unsigned int' type to make the formula
get one incorrect remain seconds value. Thus we can use div_s64_rem()
function to avoid this situation.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang
---
drivers/rtc/
4 matches
Mail list logo
