On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 08:58:34AM +0530, Pranay Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can the following patch be reviewed? I'm working on some more changes
>> on top of this change,
>> so it'll be really helpful if someone can review this patch and let me
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 08:58:34AM +0530, Pranay Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can the following patch be reviewed? I'm working on some more changes
> on top of this change,
> so it'll be really helpful if someone can review this patch and let me
> know of shortcomings/issues
> with this.
>
>
> On
Hi,
Can the following patch be reviewed? I'm working on some more changes
on top of this change,
so it'll be really helpful if someone can review this patch and let me
know of shortcomings/issues
with this.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Pranay Kr. Srivastava
wrote:
> This patch fixes the wa
This patch fixes the warning generated when a timeout occurs
on the request and socket is closed from a non-sleep context
by
1. Moving the socket closing on a timeout to nbd_thread_send
2. Make sock lock to be a mutex instead of a spin lock, since
nbd_xmit_timeout doesn't need to hold it anymo
4 matches
Mail list logo