On 10/17/2012 12:04 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:07:15PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 10/16/2012 10:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:28:10PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
The CPU_STARTING notifiers are supposed to be run with ir
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:07:15PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 10:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:28:10PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >> The CPU_STARTING notifiers are supposed to be run with irqs disabled. But
> >> the
> >> perf_cpu_notifier()
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:28:10PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> The CPU_STARTING notifiers are supposed to be run with irqs disabled. But the
> perf_cpu_notifier() macro invokes them without doing that. Fix it.
Color me confused... Isn't perf_event_task_tick() invoked only
from scheduler_tick
On 10/16/2012 10:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:28:10PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> The CPU_STARTING notifiers are supposed to be run with irqs disabled. But the
>> perf_cpu_notifier() macro invokes them without doing that. Fix it.
>
> Color me confused...
Hehe,
The CPU_STARTING notifiers are supposed to be run with irqs disabled. But the
perf_cpu_notifier() macro invokes them without doing that. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat
---
include/linux/perf_event.h |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/
5 matches
Mail list logo