On 06/14/2016 08:50 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> This is a
On 06/14/2016 08:50 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> This is a
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> >>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> >>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has
On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
>>> response since then. Already have one ACK from
On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
>>> response since then. Already have one ACK from
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> > This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
> > response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
> > arm64 maintainer
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> > This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
> > response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
> > arm64 maintainer
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
> response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
> arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
I thought there were outstanding comments on
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
> response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
> arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
I thought there were outstanding comments on
This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
2016, but the arm64 kernel
This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
2016, but the arm64 kernel
12 matches
Mail list logo
