Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings

2019-04-10 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:32:07PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: > I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring > which was sufficient in the past. Sorry about that - I missed those because I looked only at the diffstat and decided this series is not for me :) Anyway, all

Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings

2019-04-09 Thread Thor Thayer
Hi Boris, On 4/9/19 3:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future patches will follow this format. You know how that works - I need ACKs. I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3.

Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings

2019-04-09 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: > If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future > patches will follow this format. You know how that works - I need ACKs. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and

Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings

2019-04-09 Thread Thor Thayer
Hi Boris, On 4/4/19 9:36 AM, thor.tha...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Thor Thayer This patch series makes the Stratix10 EDAC Bindings specific to the Stratix10 ARM64 architecture. Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC

[RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings

2019-04-04 Thread thor . thayer
From: Thor Thayer This patch series makes the Stratix10 EDAC Bindings specific to the Stratix10 ARM64 architecture. Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC bindings to capture architecture differences between ARM32 and ARM64. This