On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:32:07PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring
> which was sufficient in the past.
Sorry about that - I missed those because I looked only at the diffstat
and decided this series is not for me :)
Anyway, all
Hi Boris,
On 4/9/19 3:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future
patches will follow this format.
You know how that works - I need ACKs.
I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future
> patches will follow this format.
You know how that works - I need ACKs.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and
Hi Boris,
On 4/4/19 9:36 AM, thor.tha...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Thor Thayer
This patch series makes the Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
specific to the Stratix10 ARM64 architecture.
Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for
Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC
From: Thor Thayer
This patch series makes the Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
specific to the Stratix10 ARM64 architecture.
Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for
Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC bindings
to capture architecture differences between ARM32 and ARM64.
This
5 matches
Mail list logo