Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU phandle

2019-06-27 Thread Sai Prakash Ranjan
On 6/27/2019 10:54 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: I want to apply your code to my tree but it isn't easy for me to do so. Did you notice the checkpatch.pl warning about the DT bindings being in a separate patch? In this case it is not a new binding but following the process gives the DT maintainer

Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU phandle

2019-06-27 Thread Mathieu Poirier
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 22:45, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > > Coresight platform support assumes that a missing "cpu" phandle > defaults to CPU0. This could be problematic and unnecessarily binds > components to CPU0, where they may not be. Let us make the DT binding > rules a bit stricter by not de

[RESEND PATCHv4 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU phandle

2019-06-26 Thread Sai Prakash Ranjan
Coresight platform support assumes that a missing "cpu" phandle defaults to CPU0. This could be problematic and unnecessarily binds components to CPU0, where they may not be. Let us make the DT binding rules a bit stricter by not defaulting to CPU0 for missing "cpu" affinity information. Also in c