Hello Paul,
On 10/06/2014 10:56, Paul Carpenter wrote:
> Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:49:52AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>>> The P2WI looks like an SMBus controller which only supports byte data
>>> transfers. But, it differs from standard SMBus protocol on several
>>> aspe
Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:49:52AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
The P2WI looks like an SMBus controller which only supports byte data
transfers. But, it differs from standard SMBus protocol on several
aspects:
- it supports only one slave device, and thus drop the address fi
On 10/06/2014 10:54, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Hello Wolfram,
>
> On 10/06/2014 10:38, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:49:52AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>>> The P2WI looks like an SMBus controller which only supports byte data
>>> transfers. But, it differs from standard SMBus
Hello Wolfram,
On 10/06/2014 10:38, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:49:52AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> The P2WI looks like an SMBus controller which only supports byte data
>> transfers. But, it differs from standard SMBus protocol on several
>> aspects:
>> - it supports onl
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:49:52AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> The P2WI looks like an SMBus controller which only supports byte data
> transfers. But, it differs from standard SMBus protocol on several
> aspects:
> - it supports only one slave device, and thus drop the address field
> - it adds
The P2WI looks like an SMBus controller which only supports byte data
transfers. But, it differs from standard SMBus protocol on several
aspects:
- it supports only one slave device, and thus drop the address field
- it adds a parity bit every 8bits of data
- only one read access is required to rea
6 matches
Mail list logo
