Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH 2/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update

2007-01-30 Thread Carl Love
Arnd: Well most of the patch is simply cleaning up the pm_rtas_activate_signals() routine. I would be think "pm_rtas_activat_signals routine cleanup" would be good. Carl Love On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 05:08 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 29 January 2007 20:47, Maynard J

Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH 2/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update

2007-01-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 29 January 2007 20:47, Maynard Johnson wrote: > The code was setting up the debug bus for group 21 when profiling on the > event PPU CYCLES.  The debug bus is not actually used by the hardware > performance counters when counting PPU CYCLES.  Setting up the debug bus > for PPU CYCLES

[RFC, PATCH 2/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update

2007-01-29 Thread Maynard Johnson
The code was setting up the debug bus for group 21 when profiling on the event PPU CYCLES. The debug bus is not actually used by the hardware performance counters when counting PPU CYCLES. Setting up the debug bus for PPU CYCLES causes signal routing conflicts on the debug bus when profiling