018 3:55 AM
> > > To: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko ; Limonciello, Mario
> > > ; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
> > > dvh...@infradead.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org;
> > > acelan@canonical.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.
On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 10:55:22 AM CET Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 February 2018 10:47:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > BTW, please CC patches with ACPI material to linux-acpi. They are less
> > likely
> > to be overlooked by me then and the others on that list may have opinions on
lo, Mario
> > ; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
> > dvh...@infradead.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org;
> > acelan@canonical.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to
> > pure ACPI driver
> >
.kernel.org;
> acelan@canonical.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI
> driver
>
> On Wednesday 07 February 2018 10:47:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > BTW, please CC patches with ACPI material to lin
On Wednesday 07 February 2018 10:47:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> BTW, please CC patches with ACPI material to linux-acpi. They are less likely
> to be overlooked by me then and the others on that list may have opinions on
> them too.
Maybe we can update MAINTAINERS file for acpi based platform-x
> > > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:18 AM
> > > > To: Darren Hart
> > > > Cc: platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; AceLan Kao
> > > > ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > pali.ro...@gmail.com; Limonciello, Mario ;
> > > Rafael
On Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:37:26 PM CET Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Remove code duplication by converting driver to pure ACPI one.
>
> +Rafael
>
> I don't see any reason *not* to do this, it seems the acpi driver model
> provid
...@vger.kernel.org; AceLan Kao
> > > ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > pali.ro...@gmail.com; Limonciello, Mario ;
> > Rafael
> > > Wysocki
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure
> > ACPI driver
> > >
> >
>Yeah, that's fixed in the branch.
>P.S. Apologies for top-posting, wrote from phone in order to not waste time
Andy,
I tested your review branch on XPS 9365 which uses power button through
intel-vbtn. I confirmed it worked properly both with usage in OS and during
S2I.
Thanks,
o
> ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> pali.ro...@gmail.com; Limonciello, Mario ; Rafael
> Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI
> driver
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 13:37 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 20
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 13:37 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Remove code duplication by converting driver to pure ACPI one.
>
I have fixed couple issues, but...
> +Rafael
>
> I don't see any reason *not* to do this, it seems the ac
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Remove code duplication by converting driver to pure ACPI one.
+Rafael
I don't see any reason *not* to do this, it seems the acpi driver model provides
some of the boilerplate stuff we were doing manually before as a platform
devi
Remove code duplication by converting driver to pure ACPI one.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
- not tested
drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c | 93 +--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c
b/driv
13 matches
Mail list logo
