On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:34:25 -0600
David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/13/20 4:53 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > thanks for your questions.
> >
> > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> >>> +
> >>> + * Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-a
On 6/13/20 4:53 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> thanks for your questions.
>
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
>>> +
>>> +* Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated
>>> +* from a table with exactly two associated vrfs.
>>>
Hi Stephen,
thanks for your questions.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > +
> > +* Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated
> > +* from a table with exactly two associated vrfs.
> > +*/
> > + int shared_tables;
>
> Should this
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:49:34 +0200
Andrea Mayer wrote:
> + /* shared_tables:
> + * count how many distinct tables does not comply with the
> + * strict mode requirement.
> + * shared_table value must be 0 in order to switch to strict mode.
> + *
> + * example of evolu
Add the data structures and the processing logic to keep track of the
associations between VRF devices and routing tables.
When a VRF is instantiated, it needs to refer to a given routing table.
For each table, we explicitly keep track of the existing VRFs that refer to
the table.
Signed-off-by: A
5 matches
Mail list logo
