On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:36:58AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in post
> 2.6.13?
Looks fine to me. I'll hold off on applying as you said you were going
to try to get a version without recursion.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To
Arjan van de Ven writes:
> is there a way to avoid the recursion somehow? Recursion is "not fun"
> stack usage wise, esp if you have really deep hierarchies
Yes, since we have pointers up the tree as well as down, it should in
fact be easy. I'll hack something up.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe
On Aug 10, 2005, at 02:10:49, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 11:36 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Greg,
Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in
post
2.6.13?
The PCI error recovery infrastructure needs to be able to contact all
the drivers affected by
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 11:36 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in post
> 2.6.13?
>
> The PCI error recovery infrastructure needs to be able to contact all
> the drivers affected by a PCI error event, which may mean traversing
>
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 11:36 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Greg,
Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in post
2.6.13?
The PCI error recovery infrastructure needs to be able to contact all
the drivers affected by a PCI error event, which may mean traversing
all the
On Aug 10, 2005, at 02:10:49, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 11:36 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Greg,
Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in
post
2.6.13?
The PCI error recovery infrastructure needs to be able to contact all
the drivers affected by
Arjan van de Ven writes:
is there a way to avoid the recursion somehow? Recursion is not fun
stack usage wise, esp if you have really deep hierarchies
Yes, since we have pointers up the tree as well as down, it should in
fact be easy. I'll hack something up.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:36:58AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Greg,
Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in post
2.6.13?
Looks fine to me. I'll hold off on applying as you said you were going
to try to get a version without recursion.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To
Greg,
Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in post
2.6.13?
The PCI error recovery infrastructure needs to be able to contact all
the drivers affected by a PCI error event, which may mean traversing
all the devices under a given PCI-PCI bridge. This patch adds a
Greg,
Any comments on this patch? Would you be amenable to it going in post
2.6.13?
The PCI error recovery infrastructure needs to be able to contact all
the drivers affected by a PCI error event, which may mean traversing
all the devices under a given PCI-PCI bridge. This patch adds a
10 matches
Mail list logo