Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:09:25PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
>> Andreas Mohr wrote:
>>> Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
>>> on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?
>> I wanted to push this though our testing labs first which has not
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:09:25PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?
I wanted to push this though our testing labs first which has not happened
due
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:09:25PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
> > on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?
>
> I wanted to push this though our testing labs first which has not happened
> due to
> time
Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
>> Thanks for your quick reply!
>>
>> OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
>> (preliminary posting, for review only)
>>
>> Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply!
>
> OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
> (preliminary posting, for review only)
>
> Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
> thus might want to do -mm
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply!
OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
(preliminary posting, for review only)
Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
thus might want to do -mm testing soon.
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply!
OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
(preliminary posting, for review only)
Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
thus might want to
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:09:25PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?
I wanted to push this though our testing labs first which has not happened
due to
time constraints
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:54:45PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> ok, barely glanced over the patch but it might just be fine. Can you split up
> this
> patch and send a separate patch for the spelling mistakes? I'll then have some
> quick testing done on the result and do a bit deeper review
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:54:45PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> ok, barely glanced over the patch but it might just be fine. Can you split up
> this
> patch and send a separate patch for the spelling mistakes? I'll then have some
> quick testing done on the result and do a bit deeper review
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:54:45PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
ok, barely glanced over the patch but it might just be fine. Can you split up
this
patch and send a separate patch for the spelling mistakes? I'll then have some
quick testing done on the result and do a bit deeper review after
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:54:45PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
ok, barely glanced over the patch but it might just be fine. Can you split up
this
patch and send a separate patch for the spelling mistakes? I'll then have some
quick testing done on the result and do a bit deeper review after
Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was mildly annoyed when rebooting my _headless_ internet gateway after a
> hotplug -> udev migration and witnessing it not coming up again,
> which turned out to be due to an eepro100 / e100 loading conflict
> since eepro100 supported both of my Intel-based
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi all,
I was mildly annoyed when rebooting my _headless_ internet gateway after a
hotplug - udev migration and witnessing it not coming up again,
which turned out to be due to an eepro100 / e100 loading conflict
since eepro100 supported both of my Intel-based network
Hi all,
I was mildly annoyed when rebooting my _headless_ internet gateway after a
hotplug -> udev migration and witnessing it not coming up again,
which turned out to be due to an eepro100 / e100 loading conflict
since eepro100 supported both of my Intel-based network cards,
whereas e100 only
Hi all,
I was mildly annoyed when rebooting my _headless_ internet gateway after a
hotplug - udev migration and witnessing it not coming up again,
which turned out to be due to an eepro100 / e100 loading conflict
since eepro100 supported both of my Intel-based network cards,
whereas e100 only
16 matches
Mail list logo
