On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>> As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we
>> don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:01:30PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> This means holding the l3->list_lock for a prolonged time period. The
>
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we
> don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock.
This means holding the l3->list_lock for a prolonged time period. The
existing code was done this way in order to make sure that the interrupt
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we
> don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock.
This means holding the l3->list_lock for a prolonged time period. The
existing code was done this way in order to make sure that the interrupt
From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we
don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock.
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
mm/slab.c
4 matches
Mail list logo
