Tim, what is it that this is designed to do that devfs doesn't (or
can't) do?
David Lang
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tim Jansen wrote:
> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 03:10:33 +0100
> From: Tim Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [RFC/Patch] Device Registry
>
RFC: Linux Device Registry
==
Summary
---
The device registry provides a /proc file in text format that contains
a list of all connected physical devices. Each list entry
includes (as far as available) the name and vendor of the device, its
location/topological
RFC: Linux Device Registry
==
Summary
---
The device registry provides a /proc file in text format that contains
a list of all connected physical devices. Each list entry
includes (as far as available) the name and vendor of the device, its
location/topological
Tim, what is it that this is designed to do that devfs doesn't (or
can't) do?
David Lang
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tim Jansen wrote:
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 03:10:33 +0100
From: Tim Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RFC/Patch] Device Registry
RFC: Linux Device Registry
4 matches
Mail list logo
