On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 26/02/16 03:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:01:20 AM Juri Lelli wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> >
>> > That is right. But, can't an higher priority class eat all the needed
>> > capacity. I mean, suppose that both CFS a
On 26/02/16 03:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:01:20 AM Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
> >
> > That is right. But, can't an higher priority class eat all the needed
> > capacity. I mean, suppose that both CFS and DL need 30% of CPU capacity
> > on the same CPU. DL wins
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:01:20 AM Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 23/02/16 00:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Sorry, my reply to this got delayed a bit.
No problem at all.
> > > thanks for this RFC. I'm g
On 23/02/16 00:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
>
> Hi,
>
Sorry, my reply to this got delayed a bit.
> > thanks for this RFC. I'm going to test it more in the next few days, but
> > I already have some questions from skimming thro
On Monday, February 22, 2016 11:20:33 PM Steve Muckle wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 03:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> I guess the first (macro) question is why did you decide to go with a
> >> complete new governor, where new here is w.r.t. the sched-freq solution.
> >
> > Probably the most compreh
On 02/22/2016 03:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> I guess the first (macro) question is why did you decide to go with a
>> complete new governor, where new here is w.r.t. the sched-freq solution.
>
> Probably the most comprehensive answer to this question is my intro
> message: http://marc.info/
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
Hi,
> thanks for this RFC. I'm going to test it more in the next few days, but
> I already have some questions from skimming through it. Please find them
> inline below.
>
> On 22/02/16 00:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafae
Hi Rafael,
thanks for this RFC. I'm going to test it more in the next few days, but
I already have some questions from skimming through it. Please find them
inline below.
On 22/02/16 00:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Add a new cpufreq scaling governor, called "schedu
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Add a new cpufreq scaling governor, called "schedutil", that uses
scheduler-provided CPU utilization information as input for making
its decisions.
Doing that is possible after commit fe7034338ba0 (cpufreq: Add
mechanism for registering utilization update callbacks) that
9 matches
Mail list logo