Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the broken OAKNET driver

2007-01-18 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: The OAKNET driver: - has been marked as BROKEN for more than two years and - is still marked as BROKEN. Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future. But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the broken OAKNET driver

2007-01-18 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: The OAKNET driver: - has been marked as BROKEN for more than two years and - is still marked as BROKEN. Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future. But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the

[RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the broken OAKNET driver

2007-01-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
The OAKNET driver: - has been marked as BROKEN for more than two years and - is still marked as BROKEN. Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future. But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code is still

[RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the broken OAKNET driver

2007-01-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
The OAKNET driver: - has been marked as BROKEN for more than two years and - is still marked as BROKEN. Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future. But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code is still