Re: [RFC]: Convention for naming syscall revisions

2019-06-07 Thread Christian Brauner
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 07:54:35PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:42:25PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > I hope this is not going to start a trash fire. > > > > While working on a new clone version I tried to find out what the > > current

Re: [RFC]: Convention for naming syscall revisions

2019-06-06 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:42:25PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I hope this is not going to start a trash fire. > > While working on a new clone version I tried to find out what the > current naming conventions for syscall revisions is. I was told and > seemed to be able

[RFC]: Convention for naming syscall revisions

2019-06-06 Thread Christian Brauner
Hey everyone, I hope this is not going to start a trash fire. While working on a new clone version I tried to find out what the current naming conventions for syscall revisions is. I was told and seemed to be able to confirm through the syscall list that revisions of syscalls are for the most