Le 16/04/2014 09:03, Clemens Ladisch a écrit :
> Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
>> I have a question regarding vector 0x80.
>>
>> As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from
>> Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted
>> to avoid any collision with Linux
Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
> I have a question regarding vector 0x80.
>
> As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from
> Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted
> to avoid any collision with Linux
... you could just use another vector, such as 0x81.
Le 15/04/2014 17:02, One Thousand Gnomes a écrit :
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:42:51 +0200
> Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
>
>> Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question
>> regarding vector 0x80.
>>
>> As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from
>> Linux's, thus
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:42:51 +0200
Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
> Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question
> regarding vector 0x80.
>
> As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from
> Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted
> t
Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question
regarding vector 0x80.
As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from
Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted
to avoid any collision with Linux, but I also wanted to keep the
ability
5 matches
Mail list logo