Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Colbus
Le 16/04/2014 09:03, Clemens Ladisch a écrit : > Emmanuel Colbus wrote: >> I have a question regarding vector 0x80. >> >> As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from >> Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted >> to avoid any collision with

Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-16 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Emmanuel Colbus wrote: > I have a question regarding vector 0x80. > > As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from > Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted > to avoid any collision with Linux ... you could just use another vector, such as

Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-16 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Emmanuel Colbus wrote: I have a question regarding vector 0x80. As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted to avoid any collision with Linux ... you could just use another vector, such as 0x81.

Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Colbus
Le 16/04/2014 09:03, Clemens Ladisch a écrit : Emmanuel Colbus wrote: I have a question regarding vector 0x80. As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted to avoid any collision with Linux ...

Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-15 Thread Emmanuel Colbus
Le 15/04/2014 17:02, One Thousand Gnomes a écrit : > On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:42:51 +0200 > Emmanuel Colbus wrote: > >> Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question >> regarding vector 0x80. >> >> As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from >> Linux's,

Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-15 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:42:51 +0200 Emmanuel Colbus wrote: > Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question > regarding vector 0x80. > > As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from > Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted >

[RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-15 Thread Emmanuel Colbus
Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question regarding vector 0x80. As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted to avoid any collision with Linux, but I also wanted to keep the ability

[RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-15 Thread Emmanuel Colbus
Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question regarding vector 0x80. As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls. Since I wanted to avoid any collision with Linux, but I also wanted to keep the ability

Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-15 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:42:51 +0200 Emmanuel Colbus ecol...@manux.info wrote: Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question regarding vector 0x80. As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from Linux's, thus I have had a need for a few new syscalls.

Re: [RFC][3/11][MANUX] Kernel compatibility : syscall numbers

2014-04-15 Thread Emmanuel Colbus
Le 15/04/2014 17:02, One Thousand Gnomes a écrit : On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:42:51 +0200 Emmanuel Colbus ecol...@manux.info wrote: Continuing the discussion regarding syscalls, I have a question regarding vector 0x80. As I mentionned earlier, my OS's internals are very different from