Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-18 Thread Dave Hansen
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 11:04 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The attached patch, largely written by Andy Whitcroft, implements a > > feature which is similar to DISCONTIGMEM, but has some added features. > > Instead of splitting up the mem_map for each NUMA

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-18 Thread Dave Hansen
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 21:16 -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:03:53PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > The attached patch > > Just tried to compile this and noticed that there is no definition > of valid_section_nr(), referenced in sparse_init. What's your .config? I didn't

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-18 Thread Andi Kleen
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The attached patch, largely written by Andy Whitcroft, implements a > feature which is similar to DISCONTIGMEM, but has some added features. > Instead of splitting up the mem_map for each NUMA node, this splits it > up into areas that represent fixed

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-18 Thread Andi Kleen
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached patch, largely written by Andy Whitcroft, implements a feature which is similar to DISCONTIGMEM, but has some added features. Instead of splitting up the mem_map for each NUMA node, this splits it up into areas that represent fixed blocks of

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-18 Thread Dave Hansen
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 21:16 -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:03:53PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: The attached patch Just tried to compile this and noticed that there is no definition of valid_section_nr(), referenced in sparse_init. What's your .config? I didn't

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-18 Thread Dave Hansen
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 11:04 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached patch, largely written by Andy Whitcroft, implements a feature which is similar to DISCONTIGMEM, but has some added features. Instead of splitting up the mem_map for each NUMA node,

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-17 Thread Mike Kravetz
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:03:53PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > The attached patch Just tried to compile this and noticed that there is no definition of valid_section_nr(), referenced in sparse_init. -- Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sparse Memory Handling (hot-add foundation)

2005-02-17 Thread Mike Kravetz
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:03:53PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: The attached patch Just tried to compile this and noticed that there is no definition of valid_section_nr(), referenced in sparse_init. -- Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a