Re: [RFC][PATCH] cpuset, sched: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level

2015-01-30 Thread Jason Low
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 12:13 +0800, Zefan Li wrote: > On 2015/1/29 4:47, Jason Low wrote: > > The cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level can control how far we do > > immediate load balancing on a system. However, it was found on recent > > kernels that echo'ing a value into cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level

Re: [RFC][PATCH] cpuset, sched: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level

2015-01-29 Thread Zefan Li
On 2015/1/29 4:47, Jason Low wrote: > The cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level can control how far we do > immediate load balancing on a system. However, it was found on recent > kernels that echo'ing a value into cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level > did not reduce any immediate load balancing. > > The re

[RFC][PATCH] cpuset, sched: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level

2015-01-28 Thread Jason Low
The cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level can control how far we do immediate load balancing on a system. However, it was found on recent kernels that echo'ing a value into cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level did not reduce any immediate load balancing. The reason this occurred was because the update_domain