On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:40:42 -0600
Shuah Khan wrote:
> Could you please send the patch. I don't see the patch in my inbox.
> I can get this into 4.8-rc1
>
Ah, sorry, I should have sent this to you. Instead, I already pushed it
up to Linus and it is already in
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:40:42 -0600
Shuah Khan wrote:
> Could you please send the patch. I don't see the patch in my inbox.
> I can get this into 4.8-rc1
>
Ah, sorry, I should have sent this to you. Instead, I already pushed it
up to Linus and it is already in Mainline.
Commit:
On 06/19/2016 05:42 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:28:47PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> Ah, due to traveling I never got around to finishing this. What about
>> this patch?
>>
>> From 7bf19b58ba02e66014efce6c051acba2c6cbd861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "Steven
On 06/19/2016 05:42 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:28:47PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> Ah, due to traveling I never got around to finishing this. What about
>> this patch?
>>
>> From 7bf19b58ba02e66014efce6c051acba2c6cbd861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "Steven
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:28:47PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Ah, due to traveling I never got around to finishing this. What about
> this patch?
>
> From 7bf19b58ba02e66014efce6c051acba2c6cbd861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> Date: Mon, 23
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:28:47PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Ah, due to traveling I never got around to finishing this. What about
> this patch?
>
> From 7bf19b58ba02e66014efce6c051acba2c6cbd861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:06:30
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:28:47 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 12:02:35 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:32:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
> > > Namhyung Kim
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:28:47 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 12:02:35 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:32:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
> > > Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Why not checking
On Tue, 24 May 2016 12:02:35 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:32:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Why not checking "hist" file then?
> >
> > I
On Tue, 24 May 2016 12:02:35 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:32:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Why not checking "hist" file then?
> >
> > I guess that could be done too, but is there
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:32:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>
> > Why not checking "hist" file then?
>
> I guess that could be done too, but is there anything wrong with my
> current solution? Or is it just
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:32:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>
> > Why not checking "hist" file then?
>
> I guess that could be done too, but is there anything wrong with my
> current solution? Or is it just too hacky? How would
On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Why not checking "hist" file then?
I guess that could be done too, but is there anything wrong with my
current solution? Or is it just too hacky? How would one check if
something exists in a file or not? Say, I want
On Tue, 24 May 2016 11:16:31 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Why not checking "hist" file then?
I guess that could be done too, but is there anything wrong with my
current solution? Or is it just too hacky? How would one check if
something exists in a file or not? Say, I want to detect if
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:50:45PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 08:54:38 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > [ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
> > >
>
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:50:45PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 08:54:38 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > [ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
> > >
> > > When histograms
On Tue, 24 May 2016 08:54:38 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > [ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
> >
> > When histograms are not configured in the kernel, the ftracetest histogram
> >
On Tue, 24 May 2016 08:54:38 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > [ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
> >
> > When histograms are not configured in the kernel, the ftracetest histogram
> > selftests should
Hi Steve,
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> [ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
>
> When histograms are not configured in the kernel, the ftracetest histogram
> selftests should return "unsupported" and not "Failed". To detect this, the
> test scripts
Hi Steve,
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> [ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
>
> When histograms are not configured in the kernel, the ftracetest histogram
> selftests should return "unsupported" and not "Failed". To detect this, the
> test scripts
[ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
When histograms are not configured in the kernel, the ftracetest histogram
selftests should return "unsupported" and not "Failed". To detect this, the
test scripts have:
FEATURE=`grep hist events/sched/sched_process_fork/trigger`
if [ -z "$FEATURE" ];
[ Folks, is this a proper work around? ]
When histograms are not configured in the kernel, the ftracetest histogram
selftests should return "unsupported" and not "Failed". To detect this, the
test scripts have:
FEATURE=`grep hist events/sched/sched_process_fork/trigger`
if [ -z "$FEATURE" ];
22 matches
Mail list logo