Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Access Control Lists for tmpfs and /dev/pts

2005-08-04 Thread Catalin Patulea
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 17:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 05:13:40PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: Here is a set of three patches which implement some general infrastructure and on top of that, acls for tmpfs and /dev/pts f

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Access Control Lists for tmpfs and /dev/pts

2005-02-02 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 17:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 05:13:40PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > Here is a set of three patches which implement some general > > infrastructure and on top of that, acls for tmpfs and /dev/pts files. > > Why would you want ACLs on /dev

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Access Control Lists for tmpfs and /dev/pts

2005-02-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 05:13:40PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Here is a set of three patches which implement some general > infrastructure and on top of that, acls for tmpfs and /dev/pts files. Why would you want ACLs on /dev/pts? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri

[RFC][PATCH 0/3] Access Control Lists for tmpfs and /dev/pts

2005-02-02 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
Here is a set of three patches which implement some general infrastructure and on top of that, acls for tmpfs and /dev/pts files. We may want to factor out some of the current ext2 and ext3 acl code and use the generic layer instead. Comments welcome. Regards, -- Andreas Gruenbacher <[EMAIL PROTEC