Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/13] mm/vmscan: replace implicit RECLAIM_ZONE checks with explicit checks

2021-02-10 Thread Oscar Salvador
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:34:17PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > From: Dave Hansen > > RECLAIM_ZONE was assumed to be unused because it was never explicitly > used in the kernel. However, there were a number of places where it > was checked implicitly by checking 'node_reclaim_mode' for a zero

Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/13] mm/vmscan: replace implicit RECLAIM_ZONE checks with explicit checks

2021-01-30 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, Dave Hansen wrote: > > From: Dave Hansen > > RECLAIM_ZONE was assumed to be unused because it was never explicitly > used in the kernel. However, there were a number of places where it > was checked implicitly by checking 'node_reclaim_mode' for a zero > value. > > These

[RFC][PATCH 03/13] mm/vmscan: replace implicit RECLAIM_ZONE checks with explicit checks

2021-01-25 Thread Dave Hansen
From: Dave Hansen RECLAIM_ZONE was assumed to be unused because it was never explicitly used in the kernel. However, there were a number of places where it was checked implicitly by checking 'node_reclaim_mode' for a zero value. These zero checks are not great because it is not obvious what