Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/11] sched: Simplify preempt_count tests

2015-09-29 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:33 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Since we stopped setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE, there is no need to mask it > out of preempt_count() tests. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > --- Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt -- Steve > include/linux/preempt.h |3 +-- > kerne

Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/11] sched: Simplify preempt_count tests

2015-09-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Since we stopped setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE, there is no need to mask it > out of preempt_count() tests. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.ker

[RFC][PATCH 08/11] sched: Simplify preempt_count tests

2015-09-29 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Since we stopped setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE, there is no need to mask it out of preempt_count() tests. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- include/linux/preempt.h |3 +-- kernel/sched/core.c |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/preempt.h +++