On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:47 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 30-11-20, 19:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > ===
> > --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufr
On 30-11-20, 19:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> ===
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -320,6 +320,15 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:42 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:37:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > First off, some cpufreq drivers (eg. intel_pstate) can pass hints
> > beyond the current target frequency to the hardware and there are n
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:37:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> First off, some cpufreq drivers (eg. intel_pstate) can pass hints
> beyond the current target frequency to the hardware and there are no
Everything CPPC, which is quite a bit these days.
> + /*
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:59 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 2020.11.30 10:37 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > First off, some cpufreq drivers (eg. intel_pstate) can pass hints
> > beyond the current target frequency to the hardware and there are no
> > provisions for doing that in the
Hi Rafael,
On 2020.11.30 10:37 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> First off, some cpufreq drivers (eg. intel_pstate) can pass hints
> beyond the current target frequency to the hardware and there are no
> provisions for doing that in the cpufreq framework. In particular,
> today the driver has to assume
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
First off, some cpufreq drivers (eg. intel_pstate) can pass hints
beyond the current target frequency to the hardware and there are no
provisions for doing that in the cpufreq framework. In particular,
today the driver has to assume that it should allow the frequency to
f
7 matches
Mail list logo
