From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
Currently save_mcount_regs is passed a "skip" parameter to know how much
stack updated the pt_regs, as it tries to keep the saved pt_regs in the
same location for all users. This is rather stupid, especially since the
part stored on the pt_regs has nothing to do
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
Currently save_mcount_regs is passed a skip parameter to know how much
stack updated the pt_regs, as it tries to keep the saved pt_regs in the
same location for all users. This is rather stupid, especially since the
part stored on the pt_regs has
2 matches
Mail list logo
