On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:11 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:55:16PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:11 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > @@ -858,8 +864,20 @@ int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_ev
> > > x86_pmu.start_scheduling(
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:55:16PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:11 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > @@ -858,8 +864,20 @@ int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_ev
> > x86_pmu.start_scheduling(cpuc);
> >
> > for (i = 0, wmin = X86_PMC_IDX_MAX, wmax =
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:11 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Now that cpuc->event_constraint[] is retained, we can avoid calling
> get_event_constraints() over and over again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
> ---
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 25 +
> arch/x86
Now that cpuc->event_constraint[] is retained, we can avoid calling
get_event_constraints() over and over again.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 25 +
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |3 ++-
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5
4 matches
Mail list logo