On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:50:53 +0100
Javi Merino wrote:
> > OK, let me pull this patch out of my tree (thank god I never pushed
> > it), and work on it a bit more.
>
> Ok, well keep me posted on this, I've tried to use it but trace-cmd
> says "[FAILED TO PARSE]" and I'm still trying to figure
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:36:23PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:23:24 +0100
> Javi Merino wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/include/trace/ftrace.h b/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > > index 0a1a4f7..d9c44af 100644
> > > --- a/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > > +++ b/include/trace/ftrace.h
On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:23:24 +0100
Javi Merino wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/trace/ftrace.h b/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > index 0a1a4f7..d9c44af 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
> > #undef __string
> > #define __string(item, src)
Hi Steven,
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 04:12:38AM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Being able to show a cpumask of events can be useful as some events
> may affect only some CPUs. There is no standard way to record the
> cpumask and converting it to a string is rather expensive during
> the trace as
Hi Steven,
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 04:12:38AM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Being able to show a cpumask of events can be useful as some events
may affect only some CPUs. There is no standard way to record the
cpumask and converting it to a string is rather expensive during
the trace as
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:36:23PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:23:24 +0100
Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com wrote:
diff --git a/include/trace/ftrace.h b/include/trace/ftrace.h
index 0a1a4f7..d9c44af 100644
--- a/include/trace/ftrace.h
+++
On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:50:53 +0100
Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com wrote:
OK, let me pull this patch out of my tree (thank god I never pushed
it), and work on it a bit more.
Ok, well keep me posted on this, I've tried to use it but trace-cmd
says [FAILED TO PARSE] and I'm still trying to
On Wed, 7 May 2014 11:40:21 + (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Steven Rostedt"
> > To: "LKML"
> > Cc: "Mathieu Desnoyers" , "Javi Merino"
> > , "Andrew Morton"
> > , "Ingo Molnar" , "Namhyung
> > Kim" , "Jiri Olsa"
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 6,
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Rostedt"
> To: "LKML"
> Cc: "Mathieu Desnoyers" , "Javi Merino"
> , "Andrew Morton"
> , "Ingo Molnar" , "Namhyung Kim"
> , "Jiri Olsa"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:12:38 PM
> Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2] tracing: Add __bitmask() macro to trace
- Original Message -
From: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
To: LKML linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com, Javi Merino
javi.mer...@arm.com, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org, Namhyung Kim
On Wed, 7 May 2014 11:40:21 + (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
To: LKML linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com, Javi Merino
Being able to show a cpumask of events can be useful as some events
may affect only some CPUs. There is no standard way to record the
cpumask and converting it to a string is rather expensive during
the trace as traces happen in hotpaths. It would be better to record
the raw event mask and be
Being able to show a cpumask of events can be useful as some events
may affect only some CPUs. There is no standard way to record the
cpumask and converting it to a string is rather expensive during
the trace as traces happen in hotpaths. It would be better to record
the raw event mask and be
13 matches
Mail list logo
