On (09/20/17 11:24), Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 19:53 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
[..]
> > Is it worth to mention, that it's still needed in older kernels?
> > Just in case some patch get's backported.
good question.
> I think probably not.
>
> There are relatively few references
On (09/20/17 11:24), Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 19:53 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
[..]
> > Is it worth to mention, that it's still needed in older kernels?
> > Just in case some patch get's backported.
good question.
> I think probably not.
>
> There are relatively few references
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 09:27 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/20/17 10:38), Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> > > enough to handle function pointer dereference
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 09:27 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/20/17 10:38), Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> > > enough to handle function pointer dereference
On (09/20/17 10:38), Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> > enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> > dereference is required.
> >
> >
On (09/20/17 10:38), Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> > enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> > dereference is required.
> >
> >
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 19:53 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 20.09.2017 19:38, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> > > enough to handle function pointer dereference on
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 19:53 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 20.09.2017 19:38, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> > > enough to handle function pointer dereference on
On 20.09.2017 19:38, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
dereference is required.
checkpatch warning
On 20.09.2017 19:38, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
dereference is required.
checkpatch warning
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> dereference is required.
>
> checkpatch warning example:
>
> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps'
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> dereference is required.
>
> checkpatch warning example:
>
> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps'
On (09/21/17 01:29), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> dereference is required.
>
> checkpatch warning example:
>
> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This
On (09/21/17 01:29), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> dereference is required.
>
> checkpatch warning example:
>
> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This
We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
dereference is required.
checkpatch warning example:
WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF'
Signed-off-by: Sergey
We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
dereference is required.
checkpatch warning example:
WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF'
Signed-off-by: Sergey
We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
dereference is required.
checkpatch warning example:
WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF'
Signed-off-by: Sergey
We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
dereference is required.
checkpatch warning example:
WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF'
Signed-off-by: Sergey
18 matches
Mail list logo
