On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function
Guys, I'll drop all the lzo patches from -mm. Please wake me up when
we've decided what we want to do.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function
Guys, I'll drop all the lzo patches from -mm. Please wake me up when
we've decided what we want to do.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Markus,
On 5/25/07, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please do _not_ rewrite the LZO implementation just for coding style principles.
The current miniLZO implementation is _extrememly_ well tested, pretty
optimized and quite portable.
I agree that the implementation may
Hi Richard,
Thanks for these perf. figures!
On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
> Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Attached is a patch which may be desirable for
Hi Richard,
Thanks for these perf. figures!
On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It
Hi Markus,
On 5/25/07, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do _not_ rewrite the LZO implementation just for coding style principles.
The current miniLZO implementation is _extrememly_ well tested, pretty
optimized and quite portable.
I agree that the implementation may
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
> Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
> > directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
> >
> > The patch removes the 'unsafe'
On 24 May 2007, at 19:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering
the
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
> directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
>
> The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering
> the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly
Hi there,
Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering
the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly 500 out of an original 1727
lines. It also removes references to the 'unsafe'
Hi there,
Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering
the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly 500 out of an original 1727
lines. It also removes references to the 'unsafe'
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering
the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly 500 out
On 24 May 2007, at 19:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering
the
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100
Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies
directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1.
The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO
14 matches
Mail list logo