Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function Guys, I'll drop all the lzo patches from -mm. Please wake me up when we've decided what we want to do. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function Guys, I'll drop all the lzo patches from -mm. Please wake me up when we've decided what we want to do. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-25 Thread Nitin Gupta
Hi Markus, On 5/25/07, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please do _not_ rewrite the LZO implementation just for coding style principles. The current miniLZO implementation is _extrememly_ well tested, pretty optimized and quite portable. I agree that the implementation may

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-25 Thread Nitin Gupta
Hi Richard, Thanks for these perf. figures! On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 > Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Attached is a patch which may be desirable for

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-25 Thread Nitin Gupta
Hi Richard, Thanks for these perf. figures! On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-25 Thread Nitin Gupta
Hi Markus, On 5/25/07, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please do _not_ rewrite the LZO implementation just for coding style principles. The current miniLZO implementation is _extrememly_ well tested, pretty optimized and quite portable. I agree that the implementation may

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 > Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies > > directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. > > > > The patch removes the 'unsafe'

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Michael-Luke Jones
On 24 May 2007, at 19:50, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering the

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies > directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. > > The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering > the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly

[RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Michael-Luke Jones
Hi there, Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly 500 out of an original 1727 lines. It also removes references to the 'unsafe'

[RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Michael-Luke Jones
Hi there, Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly 500 out of an original 1727 lines. It also removes references to the 'unsafe'

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering the size of the minilzo.c file by nearly 500 out

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Michael-Luke Jones
On 24 May 2007, at 19:50, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO decompression function, lowering the

Re: [RFC] [-mm] Remove 'unsafe' LZO decompressor

2007-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:15:17 +0100 Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a patch which may be desirable for -mm. It applies directly to 2.6.22-rc2-mm1. The patch removes the 'unsafe' LZO