On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 09:11 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> That's simple enough, but you could also just add
> log_buf_len=huge_number
Yeah, thanks for the tip, although the Kconfig change would not hurt as
well.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 09:11 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
That's simple enough, but you could also just add
log_buf_len=huge_number
Yeah, thanks for the tip, although the Kconfig change would not hurt as
well.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:27:48 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [RFC] [PATCH] Kconfig: enlarge printk buffer size limit
>
> This patch makes the upper kernel ring buffer size limit larger. It
> is often very handy to
From: Artem Bityutskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [RFC] [PATCH] Kconfig: enlarge printk buffer size limit
This patch makes the upper kernel ring buffer size limit larger. It
is often very handy to have huge ring-buffer for debugging purposes,
when the subsystem which is being debugged pr
From: Artem Bityutskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RFC] [PATCH] Kconfig: enlarge printk buffer size limit
This patch makes the upper kernel ring buffer size limit larger. It
is often very handy to have huge ring-buffer for debugging purposes,
when the subsystem which is being debugged produces
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:27:48 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
From: Artem Bityutskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RFC] [PATCH] Kconfig: enlarge printk buffer size limit
This patch makes the upper kernel ring buffer size limit larger. It
is often very handy to have huge ring-buffer for debugging
6 matches
Mail list logo
