Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Split host arch headers for UML's benefit

2005-08-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:46:56AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote: > I like this approach. In general, it seems beneficial to split these > into ABI and kernel implementation. Also, this stuff eventually works > its way into userspace headers. It is not really clear which asm-xxx > kernel header

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Split host arch headers for UML's benefit

2005-08-16 Thread Zachary Amsden
Jeff Dike wrote: The patch below fixes the recent UML compilation failure in -rc5-mm1 without making the UML build reach further into the i386 headers. It splits the i386 ptrace.h and system.h into UML-usable and UML-unusable pieces. The string "abi" is in there because I did ptrace.h first

[RFC] [PATCH] Split host arch headers for UML's benefit

2005-08-16 Thread Jeff Dike
The patch below fixes the recent UML compilation failure in -rc5-mm1 without making the UML build reach further into the i386 headers. It splits the i386 ptrace.h and system.h into UML-usable and UML-unusable pieces. The string "abi" is in there because I did ptrace.h first, and that involves s