On Saturday 29 September 2007 22:11, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> The second is the more controversial suggestion.
> In several Makefile we have simple if expression of the variants:
> if ($(CONFIG_FOO),y)
> obj-$(CONFIG_BAR) += fubar.o
> endif
Sometimes substitution looks acceptable:
> -nfsd-$(CONFIG
On Sep 30 2007 15:36, Ingo Oeser wrote:
>
>> obj-y-ifn-
>
>This is the only one needed, because it is cumbersome to express
>negative rules in kbuild to include stubs (e.g. nommu stuff).
Perhaps this would work?
ifeq (${CONFIG_NO_MMU},)
obj-m += magic_mmu.o
endif
>But again this can be done wi
Hi Sam,
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Introducing the following new variable could make this a oneliner:
> ccflags-y
>
> ccflags-$(DEBUG) := -DDEBUG
>
> grep -r -C 1 -B 1 EXTRA_CFLAGS shows that the above is a
> very common pattern especially in drivers/
ACK. Also ACK fo
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 05:02:58AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:11:45PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > The second is the more controversial suggestion.
> > In several Makefile we have simple if expression of the variants:
> > if ($(CONFIG_FOO),y)
> > obj-$(CONFIG_
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:11:45PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>...
> The second is the more controversial suggestion.
> In several Makefile we have simple if expression of the variants:
> if ($(CONFIG_FOO),y)
> obj-$(CONFIG_BAR) += fubar.o
> endif
>
> The pattern varies over this theme.
> The su
Over the last few weeks I have pondered with the idea
to extend the current kbuild syntax.
The idea have existed for long but only recently I started
to think how to do this in a truely flexible manner.
Two areas are in need for a bit of attention to improve
current kbuild files in the kernel.
Th
6 matches
Mail list logo
