> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:30:39 +0100 Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would like to come with a suggestion I have been wondering about for a
> while, why not add the config-flag, used in Kconfig/Makefile in the
> MAINTAINERS-file?
I find that the most practical way to find out who r
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Richard Knutsson wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 15 Jan, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
(Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button next to "Hel
On 15 Jan, Richard Knutsson was...
> thinking of trying to implement it
I'd say go ahead and test your idea.
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== ---= -
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mo
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
>
>> On 15 Jan, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> (Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button next to "Help"
> in *config)
>
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
May I remind that whoever uses scripts to figure out contacts should
better double-check what the script found out for him.
[...]
During development, that's a given. But I would hope that when its
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 15 Jan, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
(Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button
next to "Help" in *config)
Rhetorical question: What will this button be used for?
Havi
On 15 Jan, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
>> On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>>(Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button
>>>next to "Help" in *config)
>>
>> Rhetorical question: What will this button be used for?
>
> Having "all(tm)" information of somethin
Stefan Richter wrote:
> On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>
>>(Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button
>>next to "Help" in *config)
>
>
> Rhetorical question: What will this button be used for?
Having "all(tm)" information of something in one place?
Help-Text and Dependencies/Sele
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>> Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
> this?).
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> (Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button
> next to "Help" in *config)
Rhetorical question: What will this button be used for?
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== ---= -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
>> gcc -o test3.o test.c test.c
>>
> That produces just an executable file with a misleading name :)
#-)
[...]
>> 3. When people notice that patches are misdirected too often, they will
>>update MAINTAINERS.
>>
> You mean they u
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Richard Knutsson wrote:
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Richard Knutsson wrote:
Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
this?).
The thought that crossed my mind was:
Why not do the same thing that
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
[getting a wrong contact from looking at the MAINTAINERS file]
Hopefully, but I think it is asking much of the maintainer and then
there will certanly be confused/frustrated submitter who don't know why
I wrote:
> gcc -o test3.o test.c test.c
^^ typo
gcc -o test3.o test.c test2.c
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== ---= -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More ma
On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
[getting a wrong contact from looking at the MAINTAINERS file]
> Hopefully, but I think it is asking much of the maintainer and then
> there will certanly be confused/frustrated submitter who don't know why
> they don't get any answer nor
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>> Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
>>> this?).
>>>
>>
>>
>> The thought that crossed my mind was:
>>
>> Why not do the same thing that was done to the "Help
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Richard Knutsson wrote:
Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
this?).
The thought that crossed my mind was:
Why not do the same thing that was done to the "Help"-file. (Before it
was superseded by Kconfig).
Originaly th
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 13 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 13 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[...]
SUPERCOOL ALPHA CARD
P: Clark Kent
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C: SUPER_A
S: Maintained
(C: for CONFIG. Any better i
On 13 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
>> On 13 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> SUPERCOOL ALPHA CARD
>>>
>>> P: Clark Kent
>>> M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> C: SUPER_A
>>> S: Maintained
>>> (C: for CONFIG. Any better idea?)
>>>
>>> then i
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
> this?).
The thought that crossed my mind was:
Why not do the same thing that was done to the "Help"-file. (Before it
was superseded by Kconfig).
Originaly there was a central Help-file, with all t
Stefan Richter wrote:
On 13 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[...]
SUPERCOOL ALPHA CARD
P: Clark Kent
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C: SUPER_A
S: Maintained
(C: for CONFIG. Any better idea?)
then if someone changes a file who are built with CONFIG_SUPER_A, c
On 13 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[...]
> SUPERCOOL ALPHA CARD
>
> P:Clark Kent
> M:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> L:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> C:SUPER_A
> S:Maintained
> (C: for CONFIG. Any better idea?)
>
> then if someone changes a file who are built with CONFIG_SUPER_A, can
> easily backt
Hello all
Would like to come with a suggestion I have been wondering about for a
while, why not add the config-flag, used in Kconfig/Makefile in the
MAINTAINERS-file?
By doing this, there would not be any confusion who to send a patch,
since all "files" is defined under a flag, right? (when
23 matches
Mail list logo
