Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-25 Thread Michael Walle
Am 2020-06-25 08:13, schrieb Lee Jones: On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote: On 2020-06-22 16:03, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2020-06-14 12:26, schrieb Michael Walle: >> Hi Rob, >> >> Am 2020-06-10 00:03, schrieb Rob Herring: >> [..] >>> Yes, we should use 'reg' whenever possible. If we don't

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-25 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 2020-06-22 16:03, Michael Walle wrote: > > Am 2020-06-14 12:26, schrieb Michael Walle: > >> Hi Rob, > >> > >> Am 2020-06-10 00:03, schrieb Rob Herring: > >> [..] > >>> Yes, we should use 'reg' whenever possible. If we don't have 'reg', > >>> then you

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-24 Thread Frank Rowand
+Frank (me) On 2020-06-22 16:03, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2020-06-14 12:26, schrieb Michael Walle: >> Hi Rob, >> >> Am 2020-06-10 00:03, schrieb Rob Herring: >> [..] >>> Yes, we should use 'reg' whenever possible. If we don't have 'reg', >>> then you shouldn't have a unit-address either and you

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-22 Thread Michael Walle
Am 2020-06-14 12:26, schrieb Michael Walle: Hi Rob, Am 2020-06-10 00:03, schrieb Rob Herring: [..] Yes, we should use 'reg' whenever possible. If we don't have 'reg', then you shouldn't have a unit-address either and you can simply match on the node name (standard DT driver matching is with

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-14 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Rob, Am 2020-06-10 00:03, schrieb Rob Herring: [..] Yes, we should use 'reg' whenever possible. If we don't have 'reg', then you shouldn't have a unit-address either and you can simply match on the node name (standard DT driver matching is with compatible, device_type, and node name (w/o

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-12 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote: > Please add me to the distribution list for future versions of this. The solution patch is already on v2. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200611191002.2256570-1-lee.jo...@linaro.org/ I'll bounce it to you. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead -

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-11 Thread Frank Rowand
Hi Lee, On 2020-06-09 06:01, Lee Jones wrote: > Good morning, > > After a number of reports/queries surrounding a known long-term issue > in the MFD core, including the submission of a couple of attempted > solutions, I've decided to finally tackle this one myself. > > Currently, when a child

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-11 Thread Frank Rowand
Hi Lee, Please add me to the distribution list for future versions of this. -Frank On 2020-06-09 06:01, Lee Jones wrote: > Good morning, > > After a number of reports/queries surrounding a known long-term issue > in the MFD core, including the submission of a couple of attempted > solutions,

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-10 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 09 Jun 2020, Rob Herring wrote: Thanks for replying Rob. > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:01 AM Lee Jones wrote: > > > > Good morning, > > > > After a number of reports/queries surrounding a known long-term issue > > in the MFD core, including the submission of a couple of attempted > >

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:01 AM Lee Jones wrote: > > Good morning, > > After a number of reports/queries surrounding a known long-term issue > in the MFD core, including the submission of a couple of attempted > solutions, I've decided to finally tackle this one myself. > > Currently, when a child

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-09 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 09 Jun 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:01 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > > > Good morning, > > > > After a number of reports/queries surrounding a known long-term issue > > in the MFD core, including the submission of a couple of attempted > > solutions, I've decided to

Re: [RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-09 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:01 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > Good morning, > > After a number of reports/queries surrounding a known long-term issue > in the MFD core, including the submission of a couple of attempted > solutions, I've decided to finally tackle this one myself. > > Currently, when a child

[RFC] MFD's relationship with Device Tree (OF)

2020-06-09 Thread Lee Jones
Good morning, After a number of reports/queries surrounding a known long-term issue in the MFD core, including the submission of a couple of attempted solutions, I've decided to finally tackle this one myself. Currently, when a child platform device (sometimes referred to as a sub-device) is