Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/03/2014 08:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Serge Hallyn writes:
> >
> >> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
> >>> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Marian
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2014 08:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com writes:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting
Quoting Alin Dobre (alin.do...@elastichosts.com):
> On 29/05/14 07:37, Marian Marinov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have the following proposition.
> >
> > Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
> > namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
> > containers in
On 29/05/14 07:37, Marian Marinov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following proposition.
>
> Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
> namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
> containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
>
> So if
On 29/05/14 07:37, Marian Marinov wrote:
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
So if containerX
Quoting Alin Dobre (alin.do...@elastichosts.com):
On 29/05/14 07:37, Marian Marinov wrote:
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
containers in different user
James Bottomley writes:
> On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 10:54 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> 90% of that work is already done.
>>
>> As long as we don't plan to support XFS (as it XFS likes to expose it's
>> implementation details to userspace) it should be quite straight
>> forward.
>
> Any
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 10:54 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Serge Hallyn writes:
>
> > Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
> >> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >> > Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> >> >> We are not using NFS. We are using a shared block storage
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 10:54 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com writes:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
We are not using NFS. We are using a shared block
James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com writes:
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 10:54 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
90% of that work is already done.
As long as we don't plan to support XFS (as it XFS likes to expose it's
implementation details to userspace) it should be quite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2014 08:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Serge Hallyn writes:
>
>> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
>>> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> We are not using NFS. We are
Pavel Emelyanov writes:
> On 06/03/2014 09:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
>>> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/29/2014
Serge Hallyn writes:
> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
>> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
>> >> We are not using NFS. We are using a shared block storage that offers us
>> >> snapshots. So provisioning new containers is
>> >>
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
> On 06/03/2014 09:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
> >> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >>> Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
On 06/03/2014 09:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
>> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>> Marian Marinov writes:
> >>>
>
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Marian Marinov writes:
>>>
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Marian Marinov m...@1h.com writes:
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Marian Marinov m...@1h.com writes:
Hello,
I have the
On 06/03/2014 09:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Marian Marinov
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 06/03/2014 09:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014
Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com writes:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
We are not using NFS. We are using a shared block storage that offers us
snapshots. So provisioning new containers
Pavel Emelyanov xe...@parallels.com writes:
On 06/03/2014 09:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2014 08:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com writes:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
We are not using NFS.
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Marian Marinov writes:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have the following proposition.
> >>
> >> Number of currently running processes is accounted at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Marian Marinov writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have the following proposition.
>>
>> Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
>> namespace. The problem I'm facing is that
Marian Marinov writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following proposition.
>
> Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
> namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
> containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
That is deliberate.
> So if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user namespace.
The problem I'm facing is that multiple
containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
So if containerX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user namespace.
The problem I'm facing is that multiple
containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
So if containerX
Marian Marinov m...@1h.com writes:
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
That is deliberate.
So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Marian Marinov m...@1h.com writes:
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
namespace. The problem I'm facing is that
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Marian Marinov m...@1h.com writes:
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user namespace.
The problem I'm facing is that multiple
containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
So if containerX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user namespace.
The problem I'm facing is that multiple
containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
So if containerX
34 matches
Mail list logo