On 22 April 2013 10:45, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Anup Patel writes:
>> On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar writes:
>>> > On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
>>> >> > From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
On 22.04.2013, at 05:10, Anup Patel wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar writes:
>>> On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>
> This patch
Anup Patel writes:
> On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar writes:
>> > On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> >>
>> >> PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
>> >> > From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>> >> >
>> >> > This patch implements early printk
Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org writes:
On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
On 22.04.2013, at 05:10, Anup Patel wrote:
On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
On 22 April 2013 10:45, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Anup Patel anup.pa...@linaro.org writes:
On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar writes:
> > On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >>
> >> PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
> >> > From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
> >> >
> >> > This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console
>
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar writes:
> On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
>> > From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>> >
>> > This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
>> > without using any hypercalls.
>>
>> This makes
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for
On 22 April 2013 06:51, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
On 19 April 2013 18:14, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:33:18PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The command line lives in the DTB anyway so if you can't look
>> in the DTB you can't get at earlyprintk config either way.
>
> Linux indeed looks in the DT for the command line and
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:33:18PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 17:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > earlyprintk is used for debugging early problems, like DT parsing. You
> > don't have to use it unless you are debugging something. Without
> > earlyprintk you just get a normal
On 19 April 2013 17:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> earlyprintk is used for debugging early problems, like DT parsing. You
> don't have to use it unless you are debugging something. Without
> earlyprintk you just get a normal console during boot, based on the DT
> description.
The command line
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:14:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 17:12, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Please make the kernel pick the device out of the device tree
> >> blob. The whole point of device tree is that
On 19 April 2013 17:12, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Please make the kernel pick the device out of the device tree
>> blob. The whole point of device tree is that it's how to tell
>> the kernel where things live -- making kvmtool/QEMU
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 10:39, Will Deacon wrote:
> > The point of mach-virt is that it is completely parameterised. So, if you're
> > not emulating an 8250, then don't tell the kernel that you have one!
> > Similarly, if you *do* emulate
On 19 April 2013 10:39, Will Deacon wrote:
> The point of mach-virt is that it is completely parameterised. So, if you're
> not emulating an 8250, then don't tell the kernel that you have one!
> Similarly, if you *do* emulate it, then either create a device-tree node for
> it or pass the
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:34:56AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 15:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> >>> I am not against using 8250 emulation (as
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> >> I am not against using 8250 emulation (as far as it solves printk
> >> issues for kernel booting logs),
On 19 April 2013 15:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>>> I am not against using 8250 emulation (as far as it solves printk
>>> issues for kernel booting logs), but my point is why
On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> I am not against using 8250 emulation (as far as it solves printk
>> issues for kernel booting logs), but my point is why not to add early
>> read-write support for virtio
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 14:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> >> Actually i thought adding a config register will be easier to add a
> >> code than writing
Hi Will,
On 19 April 2013 14:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>> Actually i thought adding a config register will be easier to add a
>> code than writing entire emulation as 8250 emulation will require to
>> deal with
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> Actually i thought adding a config register will be easier to add a
> code than writing entire emulation as 8250 emulation will require to
> deal with dealing with more registers and more code.
kvmtool already has
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
Actually i thought adding a config register will be easier to add a
code than writing entire emulation as 8250 emulation will require to
deal with dealing with more registers and more code.
kvmtool already has an
Hi Will,
On 19 April 2013 14:35, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
Actually i thought adding a config register will be easier to add a
code than writing entire emulation as 8250 emulation will require to
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
On 19 April 2013 14:35, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
Actually i thought adding a config register will be easier to add a
code than
On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
I am not against using 8250 emulation (as far as it solves printk
issues for kernel booting logs), but my point is why not to add early
read-write support
On 19 April 2013 15:00, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
I am not against using 8250 emulation (as far as it solves printk
issues for kernel
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
I am not against using 8250 emulation (as far as it solves printk
issues for kernel booting
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:34:56AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
On 19 April 2013 15:00, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:27, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25:35AM +0100, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
I am not
On 19 April 2013 10:39, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
The point of mach-virt is that it is completely parameterised. So, if you're
not emulating an 8250, then don't tell the kernel that you have one!
Similarly, if you *do* emulate it, then either create a device-tree node for
it or
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:39, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
The point of mach-virt is that it is completely parameterised. So, if you're
not emulating an 8250, then don't tell the kernel that you have one!
Similarly, if you
On 19 April 2013 17:12, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Please make the kernel pick the device out of the device tree
blob. The whole point of device tree is that it's how to tell
the kernel where things live --
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:14:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 19 April 2013 17:12, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Please make the kernel pick the device out of the device tree
blob. The whole point of device
On 19 April 2013 17:22, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
earlyprintk is used for debugging early problems, like DT parsing. You
don't have to use it unless you are debugging something. Without
earlyprintk you just get a normal console during boot, based on the DT
description.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:33:18PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 19 April 2013 17:22, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
earlyprintk is used for debugging early problems, like DT parsing. You
don't have to use it unless you are debugging something. Without
earlyprintk you just
On 19 April 2013 18:14, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:33:18PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
The command line lives in the DTB anyway so if you can't look
in the DTB you can't get at earlyprintk config either way.
Linux indeed looks in the DT for the
On 18 April 2013 13:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
> wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pranavkumar,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
>>> wrote:
>>> > From:
On 18 April 2013 21:29, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:25:56 -0400, Christopher Covington
> wrote:
>> Hi Pranavkumar,
>>
>> On 04/18/2013 01:52 AM, PranavkumarSawargaonkar wrote:
>>> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>>>
>>> This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:25:56 -0400, Christopher Covington
wrote:
> Hi Pranavkumar,
>
> On 04/18/2013 01:52 AM, PranavkumarSawargaonkar wrote:
>> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>>
>> This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console
>> devices
>> without using any hypercalls.
>
Hi Pranavkumar,
On 04/18/2013 01:52 AM, PranavkumarSawargaonkar wrote:
> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>
> This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
> without using any hypercalls.
Is it possible that using DCC might be an easier solution?
[...]
Regards,
On 13:02 Thu 18 Apr , Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
> > > From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
> > >
> > > This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console
> > > devices without using any
Hi,
On 18 April 2013 14:14, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.04.2013 um 09:32 schrieb Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
> :
>
>> On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
This patch implements early printk
Am 18.04.2013 um 10:48 schrieb Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 18 April 2013 13:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Marc,
>>>
>>> On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>
Hi Pranavkumar,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:30:52 +0100, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 18 April 2013 07:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> If you need an early console, why not simply wire the 8250 emulation in
>> kvmtool to be useable from the MMIO bus? I reckon this would solve your
>> problem in a more elegant way...
>
>
Am 18.04.2013 um 10:30 schrieb Peter Maydell :
> On 18 April 2013 07:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> If you need an early console, why not simply wire the 8250 emulation in
>> kvmtool to be useable from the MMIO bus? I reckon this would solve your
>> problem in a more elegant way...
>
> The other
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 13:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
> wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pranavkumar,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 18.04.2013 um 09:32 schrieb Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
:
> On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
>>> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>>>
>>> This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
>>> without using any
On 18 April 2013 07:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> If you need an early console, why not simply wire the 8250 emulation in
> kvmtool to be useable from the MMIO bus? I reckon this would solve your
> problem in a more elegant way...
The other approach I thought of would be something involving
defining
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
>> Hi Pranavkumar,
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
>> wrote:
>> > From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>> >
>> > This patch implements
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
> > From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
> >
> > This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
> > without using any hypercalls.
>
> This makes some sense, though not sure that early console
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Pranavkumar,
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
> wrote:
>> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>>
>> This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console
> devices
>> without using any hypercalls.
Hi Pranavkumar,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
wrote:
> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>
> This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console
devices
> without using any hypercalls.
>
> The current virtio early printk code in kernel expects that
PranavkumarSawargaonkar writes:
> From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
>
> This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
> without using any hypercalls.
This makes some sense, though not sure that early console *read* makes
much sense. I can see the PCI version of this
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
without using any hypercalls.
This makes some sense, though not sure that early console *read* makes
much
Hi Pranavkumar,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console
devices
without using any hypercalls.
The current virtio early
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org wrote:
Hi Pranavkumar,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
without using any hypercalls.
This
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org wrote:
Hi Pranavkumar,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530, PranavkumarSawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org wrote:
From:
On 18 April 2013 07:49, Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org wrote:
If you need an early console, why not simply wire the 8250 emulation in
kvmtool to be useable from the MMIO bus? I reckon this would solve your
problem in a more elegant way...
The other approach I thought of would be something
Am 18.04.2013 um 09:32 schrieb Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 13:06, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org wrote:
Hi Pranavkumar,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24
Am 18.04.2013 um 10:30 schrieb Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org:
On 18 April 2013 07:49, Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org wrote:
If you need an early console, why not simply wire the 8250 emulation in
kvmtool to be useable from the MMIO bus? I reckon this would solve your
problem in
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:30:52 +0100, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 April 2013 07:49, Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org wrote:
If you need an early console, why not simply wire the 8250 emulation in
kvmtool to be useable from the MMIO bus? I reckon this would solve your
Am 18.04.2013 um 10:48 schrieb Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org:
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 13:06, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc
Hi,
On 18 April 2013 14:14, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Am 18.04.2013 um 09:32 schrieb Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
From: Pranavkumar
On 13:02 Thu 18 Apr , Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
On 18 April 2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
PranavkumarSawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org writes:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for
Hi Pranavkumar,
On 04/18/2013 01:52 AM, PranavkumarSawargaonkar wrote:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
without using any hypercalls.
Is it possible that using DCC might be an easier solution?
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:25:56 -0400, Christopher Covington
c...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi Pranavkumar,
On 04/18/2013 01:52 AM, PranavkumarSawargaonkar wrote:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console
devices
On 18 April 2013 21:29, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:25:56 -0400, Christopher Covington
c...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi Pranavkumar,
On 04/18/2013 01:52 AM, PranavkumarSawargaonkar wrote:
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch
On 18 April 2013 13:06, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:47:18 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
pranavku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 18 April 2013 12:19, Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org wrote:
Hi Pranavkumar,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:22:24 +0530,
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
without using any hypercalls.
The current virtio early printk code in kernel expects that hypervisor will
provide some mechanism generally a hypercall to support early printk. This
patch
From: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavku...@linaro.org
This patch implements early printk support for virtio-mmio console devices
without using any hypercalls.
The current virtio early printk code in kernel expects that hypervisor will
provide some mechanism generally a hypercall to support
74 matches
Mail list logo
