On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 04:20:07 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 February 2013 16:14, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > Redefining MIN_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER shouldn't hurt that much, but this looks
> > like a workaround.
> > It only modifies the minimal sampling rate that userspace can set.
>
> Yes.
On 26 February 2013 16:14, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Redefining MIN_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER shouldn't hurt that much, but this looks
> like a workaround.
> It only modifies the minimal sampling rate that userspace can set.
Yes.
> You would still need to set something from userspace to get the perfect
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 03:13:32 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Currently MIN_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER is set defined as 100 and so on a system
> with transition latency of 1 ms, the minimum sampling time comes to be
> around 100 ms. That is quite big if you want to get better performance for
> your syst
Currently MIN_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER is set defined as 100 and so on a system with
transition latency of 1 ms, the minimum sampling time comes to be around 100 ms.
That is quite big if you want to get better performance for your system.
Redefine MIN_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER to 20 so that we can support 20ms
4 matches
Mail list logo
