Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration

2019-07-25 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 08:34:41PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > As of now I don't plan to expose the label to userspace by the PHY > > driver/framework itself. > > Great. > > With that change, i think this proposed binding is O.K. Great, thanks for your feedback! I'll probably post a new

Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration

2019-07-25 Thread Andrew Lunn
> As of now I don't plan to expose the label to userspace by the PHY > driver/framework itself. Great. With that change, i think this proposed binding is O.K. Andrew

Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration

2019-07-25 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
Hi Andrew, On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:04:30PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:37:41PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > The LED behavior of some Ethernet PHYs is configurable. Add an > > optional 'leds' subnode with a child node for each LED to be > > configured. The

Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration

2019-07-24 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:37:41PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > The LED behavior of some Ethernet PHYs is configurable. Add an > optional 'leds' subnode with a child node for each LED to be > configured. The binding aims to be compatible with the common > LED binding (see

[RFC] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration

2019-07-22 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
The LED behavior of some Ethernet PHYs is configurable. Add an optional 'leds' subnode with a child node for each LED to be configured. The binding aims to be compatible with the common LED binding (see devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt). A LED can be configured to be 'on' when a link with a