Re: [RFC] kasan: is it a wrong report from kasan?

2016-11-30 11:05 GMT+03:00 Xishi Qiu : > The kernel version is v4.1, and I find some error reports from kasan. > I'm not sure whether it is a wrong report. > This looks like false positive that was fixed in 0d97e6d8024("arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison"). Also you might

Re: [RFC] kasan: is it a wrong report from kasan?

2016-11-30 11:05 GMT+03:00 Xishi Qiu : > The kernel version is v4.1, and I find some error reports from kasan. > I'm not sure whether it is a wrong report. > This looks like false positive that was fixed in 0d97e6d8024("arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison"). Also you might need

Re: [RFC] kasan: is it a wrong report from kasan?

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:05:56 +0800 Xishi Qiu wrote: > The kernel version is v4.1, and I find some error reports from kasan. First off, this is an ancient kernel. Can you reproduce this on 4.9-rc? > I'm not sure whether it is a wrong report. No idea, and it may not even be

Re: [RFC] kasan: is it a wrong report from kasan?

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:05:56 +0800 Xishi Qiu wrote: > The kernel version is v4.1, and I find some error reports from kasan. First off, this is an ancient kernel. Can you reproduce this on 4.9-rc? > I'm not sure whether it is a wrong report. No idea, and it may not even be an issue with

[RFC] kasan: is it a wrong report from kasan?

The kernel version is v4.1, and I find some error reports from kasan. I'm not sure whether it is a wrong report. 11-29 07:57:26.513 <3>[12507.758056s][pid:0,cpu3,swapper/3]BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve+0x50/0x170 at addr ffc035903bf0 11-29 07:57:26.513

[RFC] kasan: is it a wrong report from kasan?

The kernel version is v4.1, and I find some error reports from kasan. I'm not sure whether it is a wrong report. 11-29 07:57:26.513 <3>[12507.758056s][pid:0,cpu3,swapper/3]BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve+0x50/0x170 at addr ffc035903bf0 11-29 07:57:26.513