Re: [RFC] linux class diagrams

2001-03-07 Thread imel96
sure, the gifs. i have to clean up the argouml files, there're some duplicate classes. i added tty_struct. if only i had the original c++ preprocessor. it'll be interesting to c++ code which compiles with a c compiler. imel On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Wed, Feb

Re: [RFC] linux class diagrams

2001-02-28 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 05:47:55PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hah, i forgot the url. > it's at http://www.trustix.co.id/~imel96/linux/ Nice. Can we copy them on www.kernelnewbies.org? They might be useful for others as well. > #kernelnewbies have not much help, or they all live in > diffe

Re: [RFC] linux class diagrams

2001-02-28 Thread imel96
hah, i forgot the url. it's at http://www.trustix.co.id/~imel96/linux/ #kernelnewbies have not much help, or they all live in different time zone. i just wanna know how people look at the kernel at design level. is it describeable in uml, etc. imel On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Erik M

Re: [RFC] linux class diagrams

2001-02-27 Thread Erik Mouw
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:54:54PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i put some gifs describing linux. they're in uml. > linux doesn't have class, so i tried to capture every > struct (struct is kinda class in c++) related to task_struct. > > why? it's a school project. but it turned out to be a

[RFC] linux class diagrams

2001-02-27 Thread imel96
hi, i put some gifs describing linux. they're in uml. linux doesn't have class, so i tried to capture every struct (struct is kinda class in c++) related to task_struct. why? it's a school project. but it turned out to be a help to understand the kernel. maybe the kernel could use more object o