Lucas De Marchi writes:
> Sorry to come up with this suggestion only now (and after you have
> already talked to me at LPC). Only after seeing this implementation I
> thought about the implications of having the module signed in this
> format.
...
> I'm worried about performance here. Module loadi
Mimi Zohar writes:
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:59 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> "Kasatkin, Dmitry" writes:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Please read bellow...
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rusty Russell
>> > wrote:
>> >> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Lucas De Marchi writes:
>> Hi Rusty,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> @@ -2399,7 +2437,50 @@ static inline void kmemleak_load_module(const struct
>>> module *mod,
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> -/* Sets info->hdr a
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:59 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Kasatkin, Dmitry" writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please read bellow...
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
> >> and didn't really like either,
Lucas De Marchi writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> @@ -2399,7 +2437,50 @@ static inline void kmemleak_load_module(const struct
>> module *mod,
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> -/* Sets info->hdr and info->len. */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
>> +static int modu
"Kasatkin, Dmitry" writes:
> Hi,
>
> Please read bellow...
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
>> and didn't really like either, but I stole parts of David's to make
>> this.
>>
>> So, here's the modu
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:51 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
>> Or let the magic string as the last thing in the module and store the
>> signature length, too. In this case no scanning is needed
>
> Indeed. This is the better way.
>
> The main problem is rendering the length f
Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Or let the magic string as the last thing in the module and store the
> signature length, too. In this case no scanning is needed
Indeed. This is the better way.
The main problem is rendering the length from a shell script. It's trivial to
do as ASCII (there's a print
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
>> and didn't really like either, but I stole parts of David's to make
>> this.
>>
>> So, here's
Hi Rusty,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
> and didn't really like either, but I stole parts of David's to make
> this.
>
> So, here's the module.c part of module signing. I hope you two got time
> to
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 15:21 +0300, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Kasatkin, Dmitry
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please read bellow...
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
>
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Kasatkin, Dmitry
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please read bellow...
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
>> and didn't really like either, but I stole parts of David's to make
>> th
Hi,
Please read bellow...
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
> and didn't really like either, but I stole parts of David's to make
> this.
>
> So, here's the module.c part of module signing. I hope you
OK, I took a look at the module.c parts of David and Dmitry's patchsets,
and didn't really like either, but I stole parts of David's to make
this.
So, here's the module.c part of module signing. I hope you two got time
to discuss the signature format details? Mimi suggested a scheme where
the pr
14 matches
Mail list logo
