Hi Tvrtko,
On 11.06.2018 11:08, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 22/05/2018 18:19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception
>>> here?
>>> Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
>>> system wide
Hi Tvrtko,
On 11.06.2018 11:08, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 22/05/2018 18:19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception
>>> here?
>>> Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
>>> system wide
Hi,
On 22/05/2018 18:19, Andi Kleen wrote:
IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception here?
Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
system wide monitoring is permitted and this prevents joint perf record and
perf stat -I in
Hi,
On 22/05/2018 18:19, Andi Kleen wrote:
IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception here?
Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
system wide monitoring is permitted and this prevents joint perf record and
perf stat -I in
> IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception here?
> Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
> system wide monitoring is permitted and this prevents joint perf record and
> perf stat -I in cluster environments where users usually
> IMHO, it is unsafe for CBOX pmu but could IMC, UPI pmus be an exception here?
> Because currently perf stat -I from IMC, UPI counters is only allowed when
> system wide monitoring is permitted and this prevents joint perf record and
> perf stat -I in cluster environments where users usually
On 22/05/2018 13:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins
On 22/05/2018 13:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow
Hi,
On 22.05.2018 15:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For
Hi,
On 22.05.2018 15:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> > >
> > > For situations where sysadmins might want to allow
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:29:29AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> > >
> > > For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> > > of
On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
On 22/05/18 10:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
perf_event_paranoid controls in
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
> perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
> perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
Could you explain how
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
These work in equivalent fashion as the existing perf_event_paranoid
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
These work in equivalent fashion as the existing perf_event_paranoid
sysctl, which now becomes the
Hi,
On 19/01/2018 17:10, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 19/01/2018 16:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access
Hi,
On 19/01/2018 17:10, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 19/01/2018 16:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs,
Hi,
On 19/01/2018 16:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
Hi,
On 19/01/2018 16:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
perf_event_paranoid
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
> perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
> perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
You've completely and
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
These work in equivalent fashion as the existing perf_event_paranoid
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
These work in equivalent fashion as the existing perf_event_paranoid
sysctl, which now becomes the
26 matches
Mail list logo